Locations of Site Visitors László Szögeczki's CE blog: Interesting

Monday 19 January 2009

Interesting

Regarding to the "advertisement of the Able magazine" issue, here is what I have found:

First, I made a phone call using the given number 07968598281.
Surprisingly, there was a Hungarian young lady on the other side of the line, called Timea Zuranyi. She is not a CE professional but wants to create a business through Conductive Education. She is a representative of the New Start Employment Agency UK, as she has described to me, and tries to set up as a travel agency adult CP, Head injury Parkinson or MS groups to visit Budapest & have Conductive Education during the summer school holiday period in Hungary. She has just returned from Budapest. She visited Villanyi ut, Budapest on Friday and talked about the possible business with Tunde Krokko (??), Laszlo Onodi and Andras Krokovai (??) - sorry I am not sure about the spelling of the names.
So, this is all, just an other business who would like to live on CE on its own way.
What do you think?

I was told to look up some information on the website for csci under directory of care services.

http://www.csci.org.uk


1 comment:

kroki said...

Dear László,
Is it right to regard it merely as a (suspicious) business enterprise when someone tries to help people deal with real problems? As well known to you, the Pető Institute has achieved great success in adopting conductive education for adults, especially those with Parkinsonism and MS. Probably due to our results, the interest has grown considerably in the UK as well.
Thus we would like to provide the opportunity for those interested, rather than learning about our work from hearsay, to make an organised, active “visit” to Budapest and apart from getting information on conductive education and the related options on the spot, see the beauty and visit the baths of our capital.
For the time being, there has only been some conversation about this possibility. We certainly seem to interfere with business interests if concerning the “talks” which in fact was only a lunch among friends, we have to encounter presumptions of shady ideas with miss-spelt names.
What do you think?